Legal Opinion

Ferguson Seed Farms, Inc. v. McMillan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1927No. 2831. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.

The defendant in error McMillan filed this suit against the plaintiff in error, alleging that on September 22, 1924, he was the owner in fee simple of certain gin property described in his petition, which he had constructed at a cost of $65,000; that on said date he and his wife by warranty deed conveyed said property to plaintiff in error, which for convenience will be hereinafter referred to as defendant, for a total consideration of $25,000, evidenced by five notes, for $5,000 each, one note payable January 1, 1925, and the remaining notes payable one each year to January, 1929; that said…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Taylor v. McClintockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  2. Staser v. HoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Terry v. BuffingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  4. Williams v. SapiehaTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferguson Seed Farms, Inc. v. McMillanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Spencer v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Cisco & N. E. Ry. Co. v. DiefenderferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Spencer v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API