Legal Opinion

Matter of Caine

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 1980No. 341PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

Section 5501(1) of the Probate, Estates and Fiduciaries Code defines an “incompetent” as

“a person who, because of infirmities of old age, mental illness, mental deficiency or retardation, drug addiction or inebriety:(1) is unable to manage his property, or is liable to dissipate it or become the victim of designing persons

20 Pa.C.S. § 5501(1). The sole question presented on this appeal is whether the evidence supports a decree of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, Orphans’ Court Division, adjudging appellant Lillian Caine presently “in*26competent”…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kay v. KaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. In Re Estate of GargesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Myers EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Reed v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Bryden's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re:Petition of Navarra, S. Appeal of:Navarra,CSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Smith v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. In Re Estate of WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Matter of CaineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API