Legal Opinion

Almand v. Hathcock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior court. June 26, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Almand brought suit against Redwine and Ilathcoek on a certain promissory note, returnable to the May term, 1910, *27of the superior court of Fulton county. This case was dismissed •for want of prosecution, and was reinstated by consent of counsel. Hathcock denied the authority of his attorney to reinstate the case as to him, and the court held that it was not’ reinstated as to Hathcock. Plaintiff then took judgment against Eedwine. Thereafter Almand brought suit on the same note against Hathcock. The note was a joint, and not a joint and several note. On the trial the plaintiff introduced the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merritt v. BagwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Printup Bros. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  3. Kennard v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Ells v. BoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Howell v. A. Shands & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1866

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Northern Commercial Co. v. E. J. Hermann Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  2. Culverhouse v. Atlanta Ass'n for Convalescent Aged Persons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Harper v. Tennessee Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Bank of Madison v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Massey v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API