Legal Opinion
United States v. Howard
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 3, 1968No. Civ. No. 68-51PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KILKENNY, District Judge:
Before the Court is the motion of the plaintiff for a summary judgment as to all issues, or, in the alternative, for a partial summary judgment as to certain of the defenses claimed by defendants Howard.
Plaintiff seeks to foreclose a tax lien created by a 1958 Tax Court judgment. *265The tax lien was previously foreclosed in this Court on other property by judgment dated April 29, 1966, D.C., 254 F.Supp. 499. The property which was the subject of the lien in that foreclosure was sold under execution issued out of this Court, the sales being…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bessie Lasky and Jesse L. Lasky v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Morrison v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Joe Turner v. Charles H. LundquistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. MartinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Charles W. Stickler, Jr., and Nellie M. L. Stickler v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Ringer v. BasileDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1986
- Kabakjian v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000