Legal Opinion

Kendoll v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2016No. S063675PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Petitioner seeks review of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 52 (2016) (IP 52). See ORS 250.085(2) (specifying requirements for seeking review of certified ballot titles). We review the ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with ORS 250.035(2). See ORS 250.085(2), (5) (stating standard of review). For the reasons explained below, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.

IP 52, if enacted, would supplement federal immigration law. We accordingly describe the relevant federal law briefly before describing the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chamber of Commerce of United States of America v. WhitingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Rasmussen v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Kain v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Lavey v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. McCann / Harmon v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kendoll v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API