Legal Opinion
Scott R. Crow v. Daniel W. Penry
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1996No. 95-1216PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Per curiam
' Appellant Crow was convicted in Mexico of a drug violation: Pursuant to a treaty with Mexico concerning transfer of prisoners, see 28 U.S.T. 7399 et seq., he was transferred to a federal institution in the United States to serve the remainder of his sentence. Later he was released on parole and signed a form describing as a condition of parole that he agreed not to possess firearms. Subsequently, his parole was revoked because he was found to be in possession of firearms, and he was returned to federal custody.
Crow brought this suit against his probation officer, the Probation Department of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jackson v. VannoyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Obadiah Stephenson, Sr. v. Janet Reno, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Lawrence Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
3Cited by73 opinions
- Kay v. BemisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Butterfield v. BailCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Beck v. City of Muskogee Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- White v. GittensCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Leland F. Docken v. Doug ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.