Legal Opinion

Clinton, Katherine

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 14, 2011No. PD-0119-11Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0119-11

KATHERINE CLINTON, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE'S AND APPELLANT'S PETITIONS

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

UPSHUR COUNTY

Price, J., filed a concurring opinion.

CONCURRING OPINION

I agree with the Court's conclusion that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish that the appellant "used" the debit card in this case. (1) I agree that Section 32.31 of the Penal Code should not be construed in such a way as to require the State to prove that the perpetrator engaged in acquisitive conduct. (2) But I arrive at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Shipp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. State v. RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. Clinton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API