Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by Selda Goldberg against Charles Goldstein. From an order denying a motion for leave to serve an amended answer, defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

This action is brought to recover a sum of money pursuant to the obligation of a contract made and executed by the defendant, whereby he promised to pay to Louis Goldberg, an attorney of this court, $2,006.75. This sum was originally incurred by one David Frishberg in favor of the attorney, Goldberg. Frishberg and the defendant were independent clients of Goldberg, and in the course of negotiations had between these persons and Goldberg the defendant, by the contract, promised and agreed to pay Frishberg’s debt. After the contract was made, it was assigned to Goldberg’s wife, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. . RoworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Harden v. DorthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Sheehan v. ErbeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Marden v. DorthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API