Legal Opinion
United States v. Hicks
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 12, 1997No. 97-40028-01-SACPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, Senior District Judge.
On April 23,1997, the grand jury returned a two count indictment charging Michael E. Hicks with one count of violating the recently enacted 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9), 1 possession of a firearm by a person convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence (battery against Hicks’ biological son, Sean M. Hicks), and one count of violating 18 U.S.C. § 4, misprision of felony.
This case comes before the court upon the defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss” (Dk.21). In that motion, Hicks argues that the § 922(g)(9) charge violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Winston Eugene Mitchell, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Gillespie v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Gillespie v. City Of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. BoydDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- United States v. PfeiferDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.