Legal Opinion

United States Gypsum Co. v. Rock Wool Insulating Co.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 14, 1962No. Civ. No. 6192PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKerr, District Judge

(assigned).

This is a patent infringement case brought pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 281, and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). The patents in suit involve the methods and apparatus to produce mineral wool. Defendants deny infringement and assert the invalidity of plaintiff’s patents.

Plaintiff, United States Gypsum Company, as assignee and owner of the patents No. 2,587,710 and No. 2,646,593 issued to Richard M. Downey brought this action for damages and injunction relief against Rock Wool Insulating Company and Herbert F. Korholz. The additional defendants were brought in when Rock Wool Insulating Company…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Motul S.A. v. USA Wholesale LubricantDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  4. Parks v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
  5. State of Washington v. Alderwood Surgical Center LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API