Legal Opinion

State v. Freeman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 2000No. Appeal No. C-990213, Trial No. B-9805533APublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Painter, Judge.

In a case turning primarily on the credibility of a police informant, we are constrained to reverse. The evidence was not sufficiently overwhelming to overcome prosecutorial error. While we understand that much of the error arose in the “heat of battle” in the courtroom, and that the assistant prosecutor probably did not set out to make improper comments, we must consider the comments’ effect, not the prosecutor’s intent. The fairness of the trial was undermined, and we remand for a new trial.

I. Trial and Sentence

Appellant George Freeman was indicted on two counts of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. WillardOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. State v. Quinones, Unpublished Decision (12-9-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. PattonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. MajidOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API