Legal Opinion

United States v. State of Cal.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 27, 1981No. CV 80-27-EDPPublished

1Opinion of the Court

509 F.Supp. 867 (1981)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant.

No. CV 80-27-EDP.

United States District Court, E. D. California.

February 27, 1981.

William B. Shubb, U. S. Atty., Francis M. Goldsberry, Asst. U. S. Atty., Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff.

Roderick E. Walston, Deputy Atty. Gen., State of California, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

PRICE, District Judge.

I

PRINCIPAL ISSUE.

The issue before the court, simply stated, is as follows:

To what extent may the State of California, after finding that there is unappropriated water available to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. City of Fresno v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. ArmstrongDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API