Legal Opinion

City of Fresno v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 15, 1963No. 51PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

This case arises out of No. 31, Dugan v. Rank, decided today, ante, p. 609. As set out in our opinion in that case the original suit was instituted against certain local United States Reclamation Bureau officials and several Irrigation and Utility Districts by a number of claimants to water rights along the San Joaquin River below Friant Dam. Subsequently the United States, over its protest, was made a party and the petitioner here, the City of Fresno, intervened as a party plaintiff. Fresno sought, in addition to the injunctive relief requested by the other parties, a declaration as to (1)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. State of California, United States of America v. Everett G. RankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State of Washington v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Norman M. Littell v. Rogers C. B. Morton, the Secretary of the Interior of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API