Legal Opinion

Brannon v. First National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1976No. 51095PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

The plaintiff bank brought an action against Mr. Brannon and Mr. and Mrs. Holzman to recover, under alternative theories of breach of warranty (Count 1) and unjust enrichment (Count 2), the payment it had made to the Holzmans for a counterfeit U. S. Treasury Bill. The Holzmans, acting as authorized agents of defendant Brannon, had presented the bill, which was in bearer form, to the plaintiff bank for payment. The defendants’ answers alleged that the Holzmans had never seen this type of document before and that the plaintiff bank’s personnel had examined the two treasury bills…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martinez v. Dempsey-Tegeler & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dibrell Brothers International S.A., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Bucci v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. First Georgia Bank v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. New Jersey Bank, N. A. v. Bradford Securities Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. Dudley v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API