Legal Opinion

McElroy v. . Mumford

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1891PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made February 9, 1891, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and directed a new trial. This was an action upon an undertaking on appeal, of which the following is a copy: “N. Y. SUPREME COURT —KINGS COUNTY.

Read the full summary

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made February 9, 1891, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and directed a new trial. This was an action upon an undertaking on appeal, of which the following is a copy: “N. Y. SUPREME COURT —KINGS COUNTY. “ Samuel McElroy, Respondent, against The Brooklyn Underground Railroad Company, Appellant. “ Undertaking on appeal from a judgment directing the payment of money. “ Whereas, on the twelfth day of…

1Opinion of the Court

Ruger, Ch. J.

It is not claimed that the undertaking given on an appeal to this court and sued upon, was insufficient in form to stay an execution on the original judgment, except for the alleged fact that such judgment was not fully described in the recitals of the instrument. The undertaking describes the judgment of the General Term as one that was recovered by the respondent against the appellants in the Hew Tork Supreme Court, county of Kings, on the 12th day of December, 1887, “ for the sum of $122.97, being costs of affirmance and with interest thereon from that date.” If this recital…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hinckley v. . KreitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Goodwin v. . BunzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Braithwaite v. JordanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Martin v. Equitable Accident Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  3. DeCamp v. BullardNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Dye v. DyeColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Haskell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API