Legal Opinion

Dye v. Dye

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1898No. 1731PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

The extent of the liability of the sureties on an appeal bond is the only question presented by this writ of error.

In 1895, Bessie H. Dye in a suit brought against her husband Oliver W. in the district court of Arapahoe county, obtained a judgment for alimony pendente lite, and thereunder the order of the court was that Oliver W. pay into court forthwith $25.00 for costs and expenses of suit; $25.00 for the use of plaintiff, and the sum of $100 for the use of plaintiff’s counsel on or before March 15,1895, and on the 1st day of March, 1895, and on the first of each succeeding month thereafter…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Landa v. HeermannTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Adler v. PotterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Shannon v. DodgeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  4. Hartlep v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Freas v. EngelbrechtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tanquary v. BashorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Farley v. LanhamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API