Legal Opinion · Dissent

Caulder v. Durham Housing Authority

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 6, 1970No. 14095Published

1DissentOren R. Lewis, District Judge

If I read the majority opinion correctly, this Court now declares that the laws of North Carolina do not provide for “due process” hearings in public housing eviction cases. Specifically, they say: The plaintiff’s right, if any, to litigate the issues in the state courts appears more theoretical than real.

They reached this conclusion by examining and construing the North Carolina General Statutes, § 42-26, to confine the issue before the magistrate to the simple question of whether the tenant was holding, over and continuing in possession after her term had expired and because § 42-34 failed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Johnson v. TamsbergCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API