Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Jefferson Lumber Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1929No. 1 Div. 827PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

There are 10 assignments of error ; the first 8 of which cannot be considered being predicated upon the action of the court in overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial to which ruling no exception is shown by the bill of exceptions to have been reserved. In the absence of exception the court cannot be put in error, and upon rulings of the court on motion for new trial it is essential that such exception must be shown by the bill of exceptions. Code 1923, § 6088. Powell v. Folmar, 201 Ala. 271, 78 So. 47; Stover v. State, 204 Ala. 311, 85 So. 393 ; Ala. Fuel & Iron Co. v. Courson, 20 Ala.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stover v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Nooe's v. Garner's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Powell v. FolmarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gachet v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API