Legal Opinion

Banks v. Wells

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 1993No. 91CV 3250CC; CA A74845Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered after the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffs raise four assignments of error. We address only one because it is dispositive.

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint and other pretrial motions. Plaintiffs responded and, in the caption and body of their response, requested oral argument. The court declined to permit oral argument and granted all of defendants’ motions. Plaintiffs assign error to the denial of their request for oral argument.

UTCR 5.050(1) provides, in part:

‘ ‘There shall be oral argument if…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of ColemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Frohnmayer v. Bicar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API