Legal Opinion

Knoechelmann's Administrator v. Knoechelmann

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 8, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Willis —

-Affirming.

This case is unique in its particulars, but it is governed by general principles that are familiar in the law. The action was by the personal representative of August Knoechelmann for a settlement of his estate. One of the heirs, Henry Knoechelmann, asserted a claim for $2,500 as compensation for services rendered by him to the decedent under a written contract. The claim was allowed for the reduced amount of $1,200. The appeal is by the personal representative who insists that no allowance was justified by the facts.

August Knoechelmann was a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kock v. EmmerlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Doty's Adm'r v. Doty's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  3. Odem Realty Company v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Hale v. KumlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  5. Casey v. Hart Wallace & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grommet v. NewmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Owens v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Consumers Cooperative Ass'n v. ShermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API