Legal Opinion

Mentzer v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 10, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

By these actions in contract or tort, compensation is sought for property damages by fire alleged to have resulted from failure of the defendant to perform its duty in respect to summoning the fire department of the town of Hudson. Certain questions submitted to the jury were answered in favor of the plaintiffs. Verdicts were directed for the defendant, and the cases reported on all the admissions and evidence material to the questions of law raised.

The jury could have found the following facts: . The plaintiff Francis G. Mentzer was a subscriber of the defendant on its telephone exchange in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Pierce v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Brooks v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. O'Leary v. FashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Grinnell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Wells v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Abel Holding Co., Inc. v. American Dist. Tel.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Pollock v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Abresch v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Debra Jo Edwards v. Honeywell, Incorporated, and Honeywell Protection ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API