Legal Opinion
Torraco v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 17, 2008No. 05 Civ. 5572(BMC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
COGAN, District Judge.
The two plaintiffs in this action have alleged claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising from separate incidents. The unifying element is that with regard to each incident, plaintiffs assert that defendants failed to recognize plaintiffs’ rights under 18 U.S.C. § 926A (“ § 926A”), a statute which, under certain circumstances, allows gun owners to transport their firearms interstate without incurring criminal liability under local gun laws.
The case is before me on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the motion…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Revell v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Carthew v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Castro v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Torraco v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Weiner v. McKeeferyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.