State v. Martin

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

Robert Martin was charged with driving under the influence and possessing methamphetamine. Martin moved to suppress evidence obtained during the traffic stop, and the trial court granted the motion. The State appeals. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

“In reviewing a motion to suppress, the evidence is construed most favorably to uphold the trial court’s findings and judgment, and the court’s findings on disputed facts and credibility will be adopted unless they are clearly erroneous.” Where, however, the evidence presented on motion to suppress is uncontroverted and…