Phillips v. the State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentMcFADDEN, Judge
The video recording is not inconclusive. It clearly contradicts the officer’s hearing testimony. I therefore respectfully dissent.
At the hearing, the officer testified that he initiated the stop “when [Phillips] crossed over [the] fog line and up to the edge of the grass[.]” He further testified that he would not stop a car for merely “drifting within a curve.” The video recording, however, shows that Phillips was stopped immediately after his tire touched — but did not cross — the fog line. It most certainly does not show that Phillips drove “up to the edge of the grass.”
It is true that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HammangCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- State v. MosleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Valentine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.