Legal Opinion

Coyne v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided October 29, 1959PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, Chief Justice:

This is a stockholders’ attack on

the legality of a corporate merger.

Prior to March 26, 1958, Schenley Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, owned 242,742 (more than 96%) of the 252,328.61 shares of Park & Tilford Distillers Corporation, another Delaware corporation. On that date Park was merged into Schenley by resolution of Schenley’s board of directors, adopted pursuant to the power conferred by Section 253 of the General Corporation Law — the “short-merger” statute. 8 Del.C. § 253. In its original form, as enacted in 1937 (41 Del.L. c. 131), this statute…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  2. Keller v. Wilson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
  3. Beloff v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Davis v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
  5. Davis v. Louisville Gas Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rothschild International Corp. v. Liggett Group Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Willcox v. SternNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Brundage v. New Jersey Zinc Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  4. Olivetti Underwood Corp. v. Jacques Coe & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  5. Green v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API