Legal Opinion
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 27, 1945No. 31001, 31002PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
We have carefully considered the rulings complained of in the cross-bill of exceptions, and find no error therein. We think that the trial court properly sustained the special demurrers to which exception is taken by the plaintiff in the lower court.
We think that all of the rulings complained of by the defendant on its demurrers were correct with one exception. The demurrer to the allegations charging the conductor of train No. 12 with negligence in failing 'to pull the air-signal whistle cord, and thus warn the engineer of the meet order, should have been sustained. We base this ruling on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. WilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Frese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Davis v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morgan v. LimbaughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Brown v. Western Railway of AlabamaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Dodd v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Georgia, Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.