Legal Opinion

Chouke v. Filipas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1928No. 9255PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLEASANTS, O. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the court below refusing to perpetuate a temporary injunction theretofore granted appellant restraining appellees from operating a barge in Sydnor’s bayou in such manner as to destroy the oysters planted and growing on the land of appellant which forms the bed of the bayou.

The suit was instituted by appellees to restrain appellant from maintaining a fence across the bayou which prevented its navigable use by appellees.

In his answer to appellees’ suit, appellant admitted the construction of the fence, which he averred was necessary to protect…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Escanaba Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Mayor of Galveston v. MenardTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Pound v. TurckSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Morris & Cummings v. State ex rel. GussettTexas Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas v. ChuokeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  2. Filipos v. ChoukeTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Strayhorn v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. United States v. 772.4 Acres of LandDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API