Legal Opinion
Abrahim Fata v. Joshua T. Young, et al.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 8, 2026No. 5:26-cv-00828Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ABRAHIM FATA, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 26-828 : JOSHUA T. YOUNG, et al., : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM HENRY, J. APRIL 8, 2026 Plaintiff Abrahim Fata commenced this pro se civil action against numerous Defendants, asserting that this case arises under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), and the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1985. (See ECF No. 2 (“Compl.”) at 2.) The Court has previously granted Fata leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See ECF No.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.