Legal Opinion

In re Carney

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

■ Motions by the petitioners for a new trial, and motions by the respondent to' reject in part and confirm in part the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the CourtChester, J.

These proceedings came before the court in the first instance upon petitions and orders to show cause why the respondent should riot account to the respective petitioners, for certain moneys and securities claimed to have been received by him in his capacity as an attorney and counsellor-at-law. The orders to show cause were returnable at a Special Term of the court and resulted in orders of reference made by such court, with power to the referee to take the evidence of the parties with respect to the matters referred and with directions to him to return to the court for its further action in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marshall v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Fowler v. . CallanNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Cartier v. WilliamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Williamson v. RandolphAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. Williamson v. . RandolphNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. United States v. HudsonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1941
  3. Taraborrelli v. VinciguerraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API