Legal Opinion

AIG Hawaii Ins. Co., Inc. v. Rutledge

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1998No. 20036PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ACOBA, Judge.

We hold that when an insured motorist, who has received uninsured motorist (UM) benefits from his or her insurer as a result of a motor vehicle accident with an uninsured motorist, obtains a tort recovery from the uninsured motorist or a party jointly liable which fully compensates the insured for damages sustained in the accident, the insurer may enforce a policy provision requiring the insured motorist to reimburse the insurer for UM benefits paid. This will ensure that the fully-compensated insured does not receive duplicative compensation in contravention of the purpose of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dawes v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Association of Owners of Kukui Plaza v. Swinerton & Walberg Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Palisbo v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Wine v. Globe American Casualty Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Pacific Rent-All, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Government Employees Insurance v. DizolDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2001
  3. Karasawa v. TIG Insurance Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sentinel Insurance Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Watson v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API