Legal Opinion

People v. Aquart

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided January 2, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold Adler, J.

In a case of apparent first impression, this court is presented *115with the issue of whether an accusatory instrument charging criminal possession of a crossbow must be supported by allegations that the crossbow is operational. The defendant stands charged with Penal Law § 265.01 (2) (criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree) and moves for dismissal on the grounds that the People have failed to allege operability of the crossbow and an intent to use the crossbow against another.

The factual portion of the accusatory instrument states merely that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. BorreroNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. ColonNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. WilkersonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API