Legal Opinion
Rusk v. Crestview Local Schools
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 7, 2002No. 3:01 CV 7239PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Steve Rusk and his sons, plaintiffs Daniel and David Rusk (“Danny” and “David”), bring this action claiming a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as incorporated against the states by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343. Pending are cross motions for summary judgment For the following reasons, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment shall be granted in part, and defendants’ motion shall be denied.
BACKGROUND
Defendants…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Westfield High School L.I.F.E. Club v. City of WestfieldDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Child Evangelism Fellowship of New Jersey, Inc. v. Stafford Township School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Wigg v. Sioux Falls School District 49-5District Court, D. South Dakota · 2003
- Child Evangelism Fellowship of Maryland, Inc. v. Montgomery County Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Wigg v. Sioux Falls School District 495District Court, D. South Dakota · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.