Legal Opinion

Docheff v. City of Broomfield

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1980No. 79CA0179PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN CISE, Judge.

Defendant, City of Broomfield (the city) appeals a preliminary injunction prohibiting it from allowing excess drainage water generated in the Greenway Park Subdivision to be collected in the storm drainage system and then deposited on the land of the plaintiff, Metro Docheff. We affirm.

The material facts are undisputed. Plaintiff has owned and farmed his land since 1923. Until 1971, the land to the west was also farmed. Natural drainage was from the west in a sheet flow over plaintiff’s land. The upper landowner constructed a berm and a ditch parallel to his boundary fence,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. Carnation CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Los Angeles Brick & Clay Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Hankins v. BorlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Echave v. City of Grand JunctionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  5. Boglino v. GiorgettaColorado Court of Appeals · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hoery v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Antolovich v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. Park County Sportsmen's Ranch, LLPSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Burt v. Beautiful Savior Lutheran Church of BroomfieldColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Burnworth v. Adams CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API