Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Nolan (In Re Nolan)
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 2, 1998No. Bankruptcy No. 97-00589, Adversary No. 97-10050PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
S. MARTIN TEEL, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
Under the court’s consideration is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The complaint in this adversary proceeding seeks a determination that the damages award owed to the Estate of Richard A. Hamilton is nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). For the reasons set forth below, the motion shall be denied.
I
FACTS
The defendant Nolan and Sandra Butler were the equal owners of Natural Motion by Sandra, Inc. beauty salon (“NMS”), a District of Columbia corporation. Butler was the president…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- James P. Wheeler and Sheila N. Wheeler v. A. David LaudaniCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- RecoverEdge L.P. v. PentecostCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McAlister v. Slosberg (In Re Slosberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1998
- Jones v. Svreck (In Re Jones)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2003
- Burke v. Neronha (In Re Neronha)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Rocco v. Goldberg (In re Goldberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Greer v. Bruce (In re Bruce)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.