Ex Parte Vizzina
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
We granted certiorari in this case to review a single question: Can a court take judicial notice of the rules and regulations promulgated by the State Board of Health relating to the administration of a chemical test for intoxication?
In the Court of Criminal Appeals, the petitioner maintained that the proper predicate for the introduction of the blood-alcohol test results had not been laid. The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed with the petitioner's argument that the rules introduced into evidence as City's Exhibit 3 were not properly certified, and were, therefore, inadmissible on this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Patton v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- State v. FriedkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Ex Parte BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Estes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Commander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte MayoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Matthews v. City of MobileCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
- Speers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Uniroyal Tire Co. v. State Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Clopton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.