Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Vizzina

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 23, 1988No. 87-555PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted certiorari in this case to review a single question: Can a court take judicial notice of the rules and regulations promulgated by the State Board of Health relating to the administration of a chemical test for intoxication?

In the Court of Criminal Appeals, the petitioner maintained that the proper predicate for the introduction of the blood-alcohol test results had not been laid. The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed with the petitioner's argument that the rules introduced into evidence as City's Exhibit 3 were not properly certified, and were, therefore, inadmissible on this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Patton v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. State v. FriedkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Ex Parte BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Estes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Commander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MayoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Matthews v. City of MobileCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  3. Speers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Uniroyal Tire Co. v. State Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Clopton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API