Legal Opinion
Gatx/Airlog Co. v. Evergreen International Airlines Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 10, 2002No. 01-17165; D.C. No. CV-96-02494-CWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
I. Negligence
The district court erred in granting summary judgment to Central Texas Airborne Systems, Inc. (“CTAS”) on Kalitta Air’s negligence claim. Because GATX fraudulently induced American International Airways (“ALA”) to enter the Modification Agreements, ALA was entitled to rescind those Agreements. See Ron Greenspan Volkswagen, Inc. v. Ford Motor Land Dev. Corp., 32 Cal.App.4th 985, 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 783, 789 (Cal.Ct.App.1995). Therefore, the limitation of remedies provisions in the Modification Agreements did not preclude Kalitta Air’s claim for negligence against CTAS. See…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. MettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Lunardi v. Great-West Life Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Ron Greenspan Volkswagen, Inc. v. Ford Motor Land Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- PWS, INC. v. BanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kalitta Air L.L.C. v. Central Texas Airborne System Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013