Legal Opinion

Chown v. USM Corp.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1980No. 63924PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

Plaintiff Jon Kevan Chown appeals from adverse judgment in this products liability action which was tried to the court at law. The action was predicated on theories of design negligence and strict liability. In holding for defendant, the trial court found plaintiff failed to prove the elements of unreasonable danger and proximate cause. Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in both findings. Because we find no merit in plaintiff’s attack on the unreasonable danger ground, we affirm without reaching the proximate cause ground.

This case arose from an industrial accident…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. The Tj HooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Mrs. Frances Buckley Ward, Cross-Appellant v. The Hobart Manufacturing Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. Aller v. Rodgers MacHinery Mfg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Wright v. Brooke Group Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Mercer v. Pittway Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Reed v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. Lovick v. Wil-RichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API