Legal Opinion

Zapel v. Ennis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 11, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit, for work and labor. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1901.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the court.

When, under' a special contract, nothing remains to be done but to pay that due under the agreement, a recovery may be had under the common count for work and labor. Shepard v. Mills, 70 Ill. App. 72.

When a special contract is at an end, either by its terms or by the subsequent consent of the parties, or by the unjustifiable conduct of the defendant, indebitatus assumpsit will lie. Hill v. Green, 4 Pickering, 114; Munroe v. Perkins, 9 Pickering, 298; Goodrich v. Lafflin, 1 Pickering, 57; Moulton v. Trask, 9 Metcalf, 577; White…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shepard v. MillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greer v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API