Legal Opinion

Natoli v. Deal

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 24142PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAFT, District Judge.

The facts of this case are detailed in our opinion granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial following the first trial, reported at 196 F.Supp. 927 (E.D.Pa. 1961). Briefly, plaintiff, a guest passenger in an automobile owned and operated by the third-party defendant, seeks damages for personal injuries sustained when the automobile collided with the rear end of defendant’s truck proceeding in the same direction on a public highway.

By an amended order, we limited the new trial to the single issue of defendant’s liability to the plaintiff.

The second trial resulted in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrison Richardson v. Thomas E. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  2. Jinks v. CurrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Natoli v. DealDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stephen A. Walsh, in No. 15639 v. Miehle-Goss-Dexter, Inc., in No. 15640 v. Edward Stern and Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  2. Stephen A. Walsh, in No. 15639 v. Miehle-Goss-Dexter, Inc., in No. 15640 v. Edward Stern and Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API