Legal Opinion
Scott v. Home Choice, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 20, 2003No. Civil Action 02-2112-CMPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MURGUIA, District Judge.
Pending before the court are defendants Home Choice, Inc. d/b/a Rent Way (“Rent Way”) and Polsinelli Shalton & Welte (“Polsinelli”)’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4), and defendant Littler Mendelson, P.C. (“Littler”)’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6). As set forth below, defendants Rent Way and Polsinelli’s Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant Littler’s Motion to Dismiss is granted.
• Background
On January 22, 2003, this court granted pro se plaintiff James Scott’s Motion to Amend his complaint. Because a properly amended complaint…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.