Van Pool v. City and County of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action for monetary, injunctive, and other relief under California Government Code §§ 12900-12996, Article I, § 8 of the California Constitution, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. The parties are now before the court on defendants’ and defendant-intervenors’ motion to dismiss or, alternatively, motion for summary judgment. Having considered the submissions and arguments of the parties, the court GRANTS summary judgment for defendants as to all four causes of action.
BACKGROUND
I. CONSENT DECREE
Plaintiffs, white male firefighters employed by the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sandhu v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Gardner v. WilsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997
- Altmann v. Television Signal Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Gardner v. WilsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997
- O'Shea v. City of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.