Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Wilson
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 3, 1997No. CV 96-1137-JGD(RC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
959 F.Supp. 1224 (1997)
Ronald W. GARDNER, Plaintiff,
v.
Pete WILSON, James Gomez, Dan Lundgren, Ernie Roe, Defendants.
No. CV 96-1137-JGD(RC).
United States District Court, C.D. California.
March 3, 1997.
Ronald Wayne Gardner, Norco, CA, pro se.
Quisteen S. Shum, California Office of the Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DAVIES, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- (PC) Carter v. California Health Care ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Demetrio Cabrera v. D. Campagna, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Demetrio Cabrera, et al. v. D. Campagna, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Kamedula Vs. HultenschmidtNevada Supreme Court · 2020
- Lester Shinault v. Dick HawksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015