Legal Opinion

Mesimer v. Stancil

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1980No. 7910SC77PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the court committed error by dismissing the plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages. Punitive damages are not allowed in claims for breach of contract except breaches of promise to marry. However, if an identifiable tort which carries punitive damages is alleged as a part of the breach of contract, punitive damages will be allowed. Fraud is a tort for which punitive damages are allowed. See Newton v. Insurance Co., 291 N.C. 105, 229 S.E. 2d 297 (1976). In the case sub judice, the plaintiff alleges he paid defendant $250.00 in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Godwin Building Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Gribble v. GribbleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bradley Woodcraft, Inc. v. BoddenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Shreve v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API