Legal Opinion
Buckley v. Slocum Dickson Medical Group
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided July 1, 2015No. 6:10-CV-974PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
DAVID N. HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Rudolph A. Buckley (“Buckley” or “plaintiff’) initially filed this action in the Supreme Court, Oneida County, against his former employer, defendant Slocum-Dickson Medical Group (“Slocum-Dickson” or “defendant”) asserting, inter alia, a state law breach of contract claim and seeking a declaratory judgment and an accounting. Defendant, claiming that the breach of contract cause of action arose under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), removed the case to federal court. The parties…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Stanczyk v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Finkel v. Universal Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- In re RoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- In re RaskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Elizabeth Hammell, on behalf of herself and as executrix and trustee of the Estates of Herbert and Marcia Hebel, as well as on behalf of the Pilot Products, Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan v. Pilot Products, Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan; Pilot Products, Inc.; and Carolyn HebelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- K. v. United Behavioral HealthDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023