K. v. United Behavioral Health
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH D.K. AND A.K., Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. Case No. 2:17-CV-01328-DAK UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND ALCATEL-LUCENT MEDICAL Judge Dale A. Kimball EXPENSE PLAN FOR ACTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES, Defendant. This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g), Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39, and 10th Cir. R. 39.2(B). The court does not believe that a hearing will significantly aid in its determination of the motion. The court, therefore, renders the following…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hoyt v. Robson Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Micha v. Sun Life Assurance of Canada, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Buckley v. Slocum Dickson Medical GroupDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015