Legal Opinion
Martin v. Workforce Services
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided March 10, 2022No. 20210302-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2022 UT App 32
THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS MARVEL M. MARTIN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES, Respondent. Per Curiam Opinion No. 20210302-CA Filed March 10, 2022 Original Proceeding in this Court Marvel M. Martin, Petitioner Pro Se Amanda B. McPeck, Attorney for Respondent Before JUDGES MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER, DAVID N. MORTENSEN, AND RYAN M. HARRIS. PER CURIAM: ¶1 Marvel M. Martin seeks judicial review of the Workforce Appeals Board’s (the Board) decision denying him benefits and establishing a fault overpayment. ¶2 Martin argues that the Board misinterpreted the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carbon County v. Workforce Appeals BoardUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Crossgrove v. Stan Checketts Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Nielsen v. Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bracken v. Dlr Reemployment Assistance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Bingham v. Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- Amato v. Department of Employment SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2025