Legal Opinion

Madigan v. Harrington

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1902No. 1,521PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Oat Motion to Dismiss Appeals. Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; John Lindsay, Judge. Proceedings by Mary Madigan against P. S. Harrington, executor of James M. Reilly, deceased, and others, to revoke the probate of a will. From a judgment for defendants, and from an order refusing a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JHSTIOE PIGOTT

delivered the opinion of the court.

On the 8th day of April, 1899, there was entered in the dis*359trict court of Silver Bow county a judgment declaring that a paper purporting to be the last will and testament of James hi. Beilly, deceased, was his last will and testament, and that the will was duly executed, published and witnessed as required by law, and denying the petition of Mary Madigan to revoke the probate thereof. A motion for a new trial was denied. On the 5th day of January, 1900, Madigan filed and served her notice of appeal to the supreme court from the judgment and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harrigan v. LynchMontana Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. In re Davis' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Charles Schatzlein Paint Co. v. PassmoreMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Gormally v. SimonMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Carr, Ryder & Adams Co. v. ClosserMontana Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API