Warner Bros. & Co. v. Israel
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, a' British corporation, has sued to recover the unpaid remainder of the purchase price of four lots of sugar it sold to the defendant, a New York citizen residing ita the City of New York. Jurisdiction based upon diversity of citizenship with the required amount in controversy was made to appear. Trial was by court.
The suit is upon four causes of action which are all alike. As decision upon the first will control as to the other three, it alone will be discussed. The basis of the dispute between the parties is not factual but is centered upon the meaning as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thames & Mersey Marine Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- A. Klipstein & Co. v. DilsizianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Cundill v. A. W. Millhauser Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. Page & Shaw, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
- Hyman-Michaels Co. v. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dixon, Irmaos & Cia v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of NYCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Badhwar v. Colorado Fuel and Iron CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Noble Resources Pte. Ltd. v. Metinvest Holding Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Associated Imports, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- DIXON IRMAOS & CIA. LTDA. v. Chase Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.