Legal Opinion

Hyman-Michaels Co. v. Fox

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 7, 1924No. 167PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, Circuit Judge.

The trial having been by the court, and a general finding having been made, all questions of fact are conclusively presumed to have been resolved in favor of defendants below. This inexorable rule is of small importance here, because we cannot perceive that there is any dispute as to what happened, and why it occurred ; but some parts of the argument made appear to us to neglect this point of practice law, hence the mention of it.

Plaintiff had, as pleaded, three several contracts with defendant for the sale of steel rails, and this action is to recover the sale price…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harper v. HochstimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Banque De France v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. Warner Bros. & Co. v. IsraelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API