Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1987No. 8610SC1202PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Defendant’s primary contention on this appeal is that the evidence presented by the State was insufficient to convince a rational trier of fact of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that his motion to dismiss the charges against him should, therefore, have been granted. The well-established test to be applied in ruling on a defendant’s motion to dismiss is whether the State has produced substantial evidence of each and every element of the offense charged or a lesser included offense, and substantial evidence that the defendant committed the offense. State v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. David Thurston v. Kevin FryeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  2. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. MebaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. In Re PineaultCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. CornellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API